New York debt defense
Last updated May 2026
This guide shows you the deadline, possible defenses, and leverage points that matter in New York. If you already have your summons, Answered can extract the case details and draft your filing-formatted Answer.
You have 20 days to respond.
New York gives you 20 days if served personally, 30 days if served by other methods.
Answer Packet $60. Full Defense $99. Document Review $99 where available.
Orientation
Somebody filed a lawsuit against you in a New York court alleging that you owe money on a consumer debt — a credit card most often, sometimes a personal loan, occasionally a medical bill, an auto deficiency, or a charged-off installment loan. The packet in your hand is a Summons (the order to respond) plus a Complaint (the document explaining what they are suing you for, with attached exhibits).
New York runs four trial-level forums for consumer-debt cases. NYC Civil Court ($50,000 cap since January 2022) handles most NYC-based debt-buyer cases. Outside NYC, District Courts in Nassau and Suffolk and City Courts upstate handle similar tiers. Above $50,000, cases go to New York State Supreme Court — which is the trial-level court despite the name. Small Claims Parts inside Civil Court and the City Courts handle cases up to $10,000 with informal procedure under Civil Court Act § 1801 et seq. The first thing to identify on day one is which forum your case is in, because filing rules and deadline mechanics vary across them.
Most New York consumer-debt plaintiffs are debt buyers — companies that purchased the defaulted account in a bulk portfolio years after charge-off, paying pennies on the dollar. The 2021 Consumer Credit Fairness Act gave New York pro se defendants significant debt-defense tools: a three-year SOL on consumer credit transactions under CPLR § 214-i (effective April 7, 2022, reduced from the prior six-year limit under § 213(2)), pleading-specificity requirements under CPLR § 3016(j) (effective May 7, 2022) that operate at the complaint level, and the older 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a affidavit-of-merit rule that operates concurrently. You have 20 days from personal service or 30 days from any other service method to file an Answer.
Your deadline
The deadline is set by CPLR § 320(a) and § 3012, and the rule has a 20-day-or-30-day split that catches more pro se defendants than any other single rule in New York. You have 20 days to file an Answer if you were served by personal in-hand delivery within New York State under CPLR § 308(1). You have 30 days for any other service method: substitute service on a person of suitable age and discretion at your residence under § 308(2), the affixing-and-mailing "nail and mail" method under § 308(4), service by mail under § 312-a, or any service outside New York. Most modern debt-buyer service in New York is § 308(2) suitable-age-and-discretion at your address, which gives you 30 days. Look at the affidavit of service in the court file — it specifies the CPLR § 308 subdivision used.
Calendar days, not business days. The clock runs from the date the proof of service is filed for § 308(2) and § 308(4) — not from the date of physical service. For § 308(1) personal service, the clock runs from the date of physical service. When in doubt, count from the earlier date.
What default judgment looks like in New York: judgment for the full amount claimed, plus statutory 9% interest under CPLR § 5004, plus costs. Once entered, the plaintiff can serve a wage execution under CPLR § 5231 (capped at the lesser of 10% of gross or the amount over 30× minimum wage — one of the most debtor-favorable wage rules in the country), serve a restraining notice under § 5222 (which freezes account funds, subject to the exempt-income procedure at § 5222-a protecting Social Security, public assistance, unemployment, child support, and other categories), and docket the judgment as a lien. Setting aside a default under CPLR § 5015(a)(1) requires a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense — discretionary, often denied. Treat your effective deadline as Day 17 if you have 20 days, Day 27 if you have 30. Never the actual deadline.
Product preview
Answered starts with the Answer packet, then lets you upload papers for a deeper proof checklist, possible defense issues, and available self-help documents.
Build Answer PacketDeadline found
New York: answer due soon
Plaintiff
Debt buyer
Documents
Answer + next filings
Case Plan
The court system
New York runs four trial-level forums for consumer-debt cases. NYC Civil Court has jurisdiction up to $50,000 (raised from $25,000 effective January 2022) and is where most New York City consumer-debt cases land. Within NYC Civil Court, the Small Claims Part hears cases up to $10,000 under simplified procedure governed by Civil Court Act § 1801 et seq. New York State Supreme Court — the trial-level court despite the name — handles cases above $50,000 in NYC and is also available for any consumer-credit case the plaintiff chooses to file there. Outside NYC, District Courts in Nassau and Suffolk handle cases up to $15,000, City Courts upstate handle similar tiers, and Town and Village Justice Courts handle smaller caps.
NYSCEF (New York State Courts Electronic Filing) is mandatory for attorneys in Supreme Court and many other courts. Pro se defendants can register to e-file at nycourts.gov/efile, but practice varies — many NYC Civil Court branches still accept paper filings from pro se defendants without NYSCEF registration. Check your specific court's website before assuming one route or the other. The 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a affidavit-of-merit rule (in force since 2014-2015) predates the CCFA and stacks on top of the CCFA pleading-specificity requirements at CPLR § 3016(j) — both rules apply concurrently to debt-buyer complaints.
A New York-specific resource for unrepresented litigants: CLARO (Civil Legal Advice and Resource Office) walk-in clinics provide free same-day legal advice to pro se defendants in consumer-debt cases. Volunteer attorneys staff CLARO clinics in Manhattan, Brooklyn, the Bronx, Queens, Staten Island, Westchester County, Nassau County, and several upstate counties. CLARO does not provide ongoing representation but is a meaningful resource for one-time consultation — the clinic will review your summons, help you understand your defenses, and review a draft Answer. The current schedule is on the New York City Civil Court website.
Statute of limitations
New York’s statute of limitations on debt is 3 years, codified at CPLR § 214-i. The clock typically runs from: date of last payment or charge-off date, whichever is later.
If the time-bar has run, the debt may not be legally collectible in court — but you generally have to raise the defense yourself. It is not raised automatically.
Compare this entry with the national debt lawsuit deadline and statute-of-limitations table.
For the old-debt defense specifically, open the New York statute-of-limitations hub entry.
Your rights
The one thing most people miss
Key fact
New York has one of the shortest statutes of limitations for debt — 3 years. If the debt is older than 3 years from your last payment, you may have a strong statute-of-limitations issue to preserve.
The framework
Concise summaries below. Use these as issue-spotting prompts tied to your user-confirmed facts and court papers.
CPLR § 214-i — three-year statute of limitations
CPLR § 214-i (effective April 7, 2022); CPLR § 213(2) (prior six-year limit, superseded for consumer credit)
New York has one of the shortest consumer-credit statutes of limitations. The 2021 Consumer Credit Fairness Act created CPLR § 214-i — a three-year SOL on consumer credit transactions — effective April 7, 2022. Some debts that were timely under the prior six-year regime may now be time-barred. The clock often runs from the date of breach (typically your last payment), does not restart on assignment to a debt buyer, and does not restart on dunning correspondence. This can be a powerful defense when the dates support it.
Read the full breakdown →CPLR § 3016(j) pleading specificity and 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a affidavit
CPLR § 3016(j) (effective May 7, 2022); 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a (in force since 2014-2015)
§ 3016(j) requires a consumer-credit complaint to plead specific elements — original creditor, account identifier, last payment or charge-off date, SOL non-expiration statement, full chain of assignment, and itemization of principal/interest/fees — plus attach the contract or charge-off statement where required. 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a separately requires an affidavit from a person with actual knowledge of the original creditor's records. Missing or defective materials may support a CPLR § 3211(a)(3) or (a)(7) challenge at the pleading stage.
Read the full breakdown →Chain of title and standing under debt-buyer rules
Palisades Collection v. Kedik, 67 A.D.3d 1329 (4th Dep't 2009); CPLR § 3211(a)(3)
New York debt buyers may need to show the chain of assignment for the specific account being sued upon, not merely for the bulk portfolio. Palisades Collection v. Kedik (4th Dep't 2009) is an important chain-of-title authority and was incorporated into the CCFA framework. Generic block bills of sale that do not specifically identify your account number may be insufficient. Multi-step chains can create larger documentation issues. Review whether lack of standing under CPLR § 3211(a)(3) and account-level schedule requests fit your case.
Read the full breakdown →FDCPA and GBL § 349 counterclaims
15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq.; N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349
The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act stacks with New York General Business Law § 349 — both apply to the same conduct, and damages are not duplicative. FDCPA: actual damages, $1,000 statutory, uncapped attorney-fee shift under § 1692k(a)(3). GBL § 349: actual damages, $50 minimum statutory (no cap), discretionary attorney's fees, and treble damages on willful violations. Under CPLR § 3019, counterclaims in New York are PERMISSIVE — opposite of Florida's rule — so you can plead them here for settlement leverage or save them for a separate state or federal action.
Read the full breakdown →Why this state
New York has a strong consumer-debt defense framework, and the reasons are recent and structural rather than ideological or historical. The 2021 Consumer Credit Fairness Act, with staged effective dates in 2022, created several important tools to review.
First, the CPLR § 214-i three-year SOL is one of the shortest consumer-credit limitations periods. When CCFA cut the SOL from six years to three years effective April 7, 2022, some debt-buyer portfolios that were timely under the old six-year regime became vulnerable to statute-of-limitations challenges. The effect depends on filing date, last-payment date, charge-off date, and claim type.
Second, the CPLR § 3016(j) pleading-specificity rule plus the older 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a affidavit-of-merit rule operate at the pleading stage. A complaint with thin allegations, generic affidavits, missing chain-of-assignment specificity, no SOL non-expiration statement, or no charge-off itemization may support a CPLR § 3211(a)(3)/(7) challenge before discovery opens.
Third, the post-judgment collection regime has important debtor protections. CPLR § 5231 caps wage execution at the lesser of 10% of gross or the amount over 30× minimum wage. CPLR § 5222-a protects Social Security, public assistance, unemployment, child support, and other exempt income from bank-account restraint, with an automatic two-times-monthly-deposit protection that requires no claim form. These protections can affect collection economics and settlement posture.
Fourth, GBL § 349 may supply a counterclaim where the facts support deceptive or misleading conduct. Under CPLR § 3019, counterclaims in New York are permissive, so defendants may have flexibility about whether to plead them in the debt case or bring a separate action.
Real case
I do not have a New York case to cite as my own. The case I won pro se was Plaza Services LLC v. DiSalle, Eau Claire County Case No. 2025SC000885 — a Wisconsin Small Claims action, not a New York case. The complaint was the standard debt-buyer template: a thin allegation of breach, a generic affidavit, a chain-of-title summary that named no original creditor with specificity, and a copy of a cardholder agreement attached as an exhibit. The cardholder agreement contained a binding arbitration clause naming the American Arbitration Association as the administering forum.
I filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration under Wisconsin's arbitration framework. The court granted the motion and the dispute moved to AAA administration. Under the AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules, the business that wants AAA to administer the arbitration must pay a business filing fee within a specific window. Plaza Services failed to pay the fee. The AAA closed the file for non-compliance. I returned to Eau Claire County and moved to dismiss for the plaintiff's failure to comply with the arbitration procedure they themselves had invoked. On April 9, 2026, Commissioner Johnson dismissed the case without prejudice.
This playbook transfers to New York under CPLR Article 75 and the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. §§ 2, 3). CPLR § 7503(a) directs the court to compel arbitration on the application of any aggrieved party. The Supreme Court's decisions in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), and Morgan v. Sundance, 596 U.S. 411 (2022), confirm the FAA pre-empts any state-law obstacle to enforcement, and New York courts have a long-standing pro-arbitration policy under cases like Harris v. Shearson Hayden Stone, 82 A.D.2d 87 (1st Dep't 1981). The AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules are national, not state-specific, so the business-fee-abandonment dynamic works the same way in New York.
The honest framing: this is a transferable playbook with New York statutory hooks, not a New York outcome. To this author's knowledge no completed New York trial-court case has validated this exact sequence end-to-end in a debt-buyer context. The arbitration clause is not the win; the playbook around enforcing it is. Answered exists to compress that playbook into a product.
Plaza Services LLC v. DiSalle, Eau Claire County Case No. 2025SC000885 (Wis. Cir. Ct., dismissed without prejudice April 9, 2026).
Action plan
Days 1-2 — Read the summons and complaint carefully. Identify (a) the named plaintiff; (b) the alleged amount; (c) the court (NYC Civil Court for $50K and below, Supreme Court for above $50K, District Court / City Court / Town Justice Court outside NYC); (d) the index number; (e) the date you were served and the CPLR § 308 subdivision used per the affidavit of service. The § 308 subdivision determines your deadline — § 308(1) personal service gives 20 days, every other method gives 30. Calendar your deadline.
Days 3-4 — Do not ignore the lawsuit. Do not call the plaintiff. Do not pay anything — even a token partial payment can revive a stale debt under CPLR § 17. Identify which of the four main issues may apply: When was your last payment? More than three years ago? Preserve the § 214-i SOL issue after CCFA. Did the complaint plead the six § 3016(j) elements and attach the contract or charge-off statement? If not, § 3211(a)(7) motion to dismiss. Did the plaintiff file a 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a affidavit signed by an affiant with actual knowledge? If not, affidavit-of-merit issue. Are there FDCPA or GBL § 349 violations? Then a counterclaim may be in play — and under § 3019 you can plead it here or save it for a separate action.
Days 5-10 — Gather records. Pull all three credit reports at AnnualCreditReport.com and find the original creditor name on the tradeline. Compare to the plaintiff named on the complaint — they are almost always different, and the gap is your standing issue. Save every collection letter and call log. Build a timeline of last payment, charge-off, and debt-buyer first contact.
Days 11-17 (or 11-27 if you have a 30-day deadline) — Draft your Verified Answer. Components: (a) caption matching the summons exactly with the index number; (b) admit-or-deny each numbered allegation, denying anything you cannot personally verify; (c) affirmative defenses (SOL under CPLR § 214-i; failure to plead the elements required by § 3016(j); failure to satisfy 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a affidavit-of-merit requirements; lack of standing under Palisades Collection v. Kedik); (d) counterclaims if applicable — remember § 3019 makes counterclaims permissive, so you have flexibility about where to bring them.
Days 18-20 (or 28-30) — File your Answer. Two options: (a) take the Answer to the clerk of court for the court where the case is pending and file in person — the clerk will date-stamp your copy; or (b) register at nycourts.gov/efile to file via NYSCEF (mandatory in Supreme Court, optional in many Civil Courts for pro se). Mail or e-serve a copy on the plaintiff's attorney with an Affidavit of Service. Answered does not mail-file Answers in New York — you handle the filing yourself. Visit a CLARO walk-in clinic for same-day attorney review if you are in a covered county. File by Day 17 (or 27), never the actual deadline.
A one-page guide to your rights, your deadline, and your first three steps — specific to New York courts.
No spam. One email with your checklist, then occasional updates. Unsubscribe anytime.
Frequently asked questions
How long do I have to respond to a debt collection lawsuit in New York?
You have 20 days to respond if served personally, or 30 days if served by another method such as substituted service, under CPLR § 3012. If you miss this deadline, the plaintiff can apply for a default judgment, giving them the right to garnish up to 10% of your gross income or restrain your bank account.
What is the statute of limitations on credit card debt in New York?
New York's statute of limitations on consumer credit card debt is 3 years under CPLR § 214-i — one of the shortest in the country. The clock runs from your last payment or charge-off date, whichever is later. If the debt is older than 3 years, the plaintiff may not be able to win in court — but you must raise this defense yourself.
Can I fight a debt buyer in New York without a lawyer?
Yes. New York Civil Court and Supreme Court allow self-represented defendants. Small claims courts (up to $10,000) are designed for non-lawyers. File your Answer within 20 days of personal service or 30 days of any other service method under CPLR § 3012. The Consumer Credit Fairness Act (CPLR § 3016(j)) requires debt buyers to plead specific elements, and missing elements may support a challenge under CPLR § 3211(a)(7). The 3-year SOL under CPLR § 214-i may time-bar some claims. CLARO walk-in clinics in NYC and several upstate counties provide free same-day attorney advice for pro se defendants.
What defenses do I have against a debt buyer in New York?
New York's Consumer Credit Fairness Act (CPLR § 3016(j), effective May 7, 2022) requires debt-buyer complaints to plead specific elements: original creditor, account identifier, default date, a statement that the SOL has not expired, full chain of title, and charge-off itemization — plus the signed contract or charge-off statement where required. Missing required elements may support dismissal under CPLR § 3211(a)(3). Palisades Collection v. Kedik (4th Dep't 2009) is an important chain-of-title case to review.
What happens if I ignore a debt collection lawsuit in New York?
If you do not respond within 20 days (personal service) or 30 days (other service), the plaintiff can apply for a default judgment. In New York, wage garnishment is capped at 10% of gross wages, but bank account restraining orders can freeze funds up to the judgment amount subject to exemption rules.
Does New York have any special protections for debt collection defendants?
Yes. New York's Consumer Credit Fairness Act creates detailed debt-buyer pleading requirements. New York also has one of the country's shortest statutes of limitations — 3 years under CPLR § 214-i. If your original credit card agreement has an arbitration clause, arbitration may be an issue to review under CPLR § 7503(a), but the clause must exist, apply, and be enforced by the court.
Get started
Enter the case basics from your summons. Answered drafts your filing-formatted Answerfirst, then lets you upload papers later for deeper proof issue scanning.
Common plaintiffs
The most active debt buyers and original creditors suing New York consumers right now. Each link goes to a state-specific defense guide for that plaintiff.
LVNV Funding LLC
A major debt buyer suing New York consumers. Owned by Sherman Financial Group; Resurgent Capital Services is the operating servicer. Multi-step Sherman assignment chains can create CPLR § 3016(j) and 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a issues to review.
Cavalry SPV I LLC
Greenwich, Connecticut debt buyer affiliated with Cavalry Investments. Heavy New York filing volume. Subject to a 2015 CFPB consent order ($92M consumer relief, $10M civil money penalty) for false statements in collection lawsuits and collecting on time-barred debts.
Portfolio Recovery Associates
PRA Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:PRAA), publicly-traded, headquartered in Norfolk, VA. Subject to a 2015 CFPB consent order ($19M consumer redress + $8M civil money penalty) and a 2023 follow-up action ($24M settlement). Those enforcement records can be useful context, but defendants should focus first on account-level proof, CPLR § 3016(j), and 22 NYCRR Part 202.27-a affidavit requirements in their own case.
Midland Credit Management
Encore Capital Group (NASDAQ:ECPG), publicly-traded, headquartered in San Diego. Files in New York under both Midland Funding LLC (holder) and Midland Credit Management (servicer). Federal CFPB enforcement against Encore Capital Group has produced significant orders, including findings involving time-barred lawsuits and disclosure problems. New York defendants should still focus on the documents and allegations in their own case: chain of title, CPLR § 3016(j), SOL timing, and any supported FDCPA or GBL § 349 issues.
Related reading
Start with the plaintiff-specific guides we have for people sued in New York. Each link below goes to a state-specific defense guide for that plaintiff.
Free New York paper scan
20 days to answer. Answer Packet first.
Self-help software, not a law firm.