Photo of John DiSalle, founder of Answered

About the founder

John DiSalle

I built Answered after defending my own debt-buyer lawsuit in Wisconsin Circuit Court — pro se, with no attorney, against a debt buyer that filed without proper standing. Plaza Services LLC v. DiSalle, Eau Claire County Case No. 2025SC000885, dismissed April 9, 2026. Answered is the system I wish I had had on day one.

The case

Plaza Services LLC v. DiSalle

In May 2025 I was served by Plaza Services LLC for $2,892.96 in Eau Claire County Small Claims Court. Plaza Services is a debt buyer. They had purchased the alleged underlying credit card account from a prior holder somewhere down the chain, and they filed a Wisconsin Small Claims action to collect.

I read the original cardholder agreement that the plaintiff had attached as an exhibit, and I found an arbitration clause. That single clause changed the case. Wisconsin small-claims procedure allows a defendant to move to compel arbitration when the underlying contract requires it, and a plaintiff who invokes a contract is bound by the arbitration provision inside that same contract. I filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration based on the cardholder agreement’s arbitration clause.

The court granted the motion and the dispute moved to the American Arbitration Association under the AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules. The AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules require the business that is asking the AAA to administer the arbitration to pay a business filing fee within a specific window. Plaza Services failed to pay that fee within the required window. The AAA closed the file for non-compliance.

I returned to Eau Claire County with the AAA closure record and asked the court to dismiss for the plaintiff’s failure to comply with the arbitration procedure they themselves had invoked. On April 9, 2026, Commissioner Johnson dismissed the case without prejudice, finding that the plaintiff had failed to demonstrate compliance with the arbitration requirements they had invoked under their own cardholder agreement.

The procedural arc was eight distinct moves over roughly nine months — each one filed pro se, each one walked through with the Eau Claire County Clerk of Courts office, each one teaching me something about how Wisconsin Small Claims actually works on the ground. None of what I did was novel; all of it was findable in the Wisconsin Statutes and the AAA rulebook. The hardest part was knowing what to look for. Answered exists to shorten that gap for the next defendant.

CasePlaza Services LLC v. DiSalle
Case number2025SC000885
CourtEau Claire County Circuit Court, Small Claims
DispositionDismissed without prejudice, April 9, 2026

What I built

Answered

Answered is a self-help platform for pro se debt-defense defendants. It runs as a mobile app on iOS and as a web app at answeredlaw.com. Currently the product supports defendants in 17 states, with mail filing live for six (Wisconsin, Texas, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Minnesota, and Michigan). The full defense workflow — case analysis, deadline tracking, court-ready Answer generation, statute-of-limitations math, affirmative-defense selection, and where applicable a counterclaim template — unlocks for $99 one-time, no subscription.

The state guides at /sued-for-debtare the front door for people who don’t yet have the app. Each guide is reviewed by a licensed attorney in that state before publication and updated quarterly as statutes and case law change.

Editorial process

How this content is created and reviewed

State defense guides are drafted by John from primary sources — state statutes, rules of civil procedure, reported state and federal cases, and where applicable, the relevant Uniform Commercial Code provisions. Each state’s guide is then reviewed by a licensed attorney in that state before publication.

Where a reviewing attorney has agreed to be named, we name them on the page. Where attorney review has been provided on condition of anonymity, we honor that — you will see language such as “reviewed by a licensed [State] attorney whose name is withheld at their request” on those pages. We do not publish a state guide without attorney review, and we do not name attorneys who have asked not to be named. We also do not imply attorney review for states that have not been reviewed.

Each guide carries a Last-Updated timestamp. We re-review each published state on a quarterly cadence and update for any statutory or appellate-level case law changes that affect the analysis.

Long-form posts on the blog are drafted with assistance from Anthropic’s Claude API and edited for accuracy by a human before publication. AI is used for first-pass drafting and for surfacing relevant statutory and case citations; it is not used to give legal advice to users of the app, and every published draft is reviewed against primary sources before going live.

This site provides general information about debt-defense procedure. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always verify procedural details with your court clerk or a licensed attorney in your state.

Operating entity

About ellaSiD LLC

Answered is operated by ellaSiD LLC, a single-member limited liability company formed in Wisconsin. Support and editorial inquiries: support@answeredlaw.com. We don’t publish a physical office address — the company is run remotely from Eau Claire, and email is the right channel for everything.

Get started

Read the Wisconsin defense guide

The same framework I used in my own case — statute of limitations, Wisconsin Consumer Act counterclaim, chain-of-title attacks, FDCPA cumulative remedy — written up for defendants who are reading their summons for the first time.